I found these 12 questions on a book recommanded in my Leadership class. They are quite easy to understand but useful as well.
1. What do I want?
2. What are my choices?
3. What assumptions am I making?
4. What am I responsible for?
5. How else can I think about this?
6. What is the other person thinking, feeling, and wanting?
7. What am I missing or avoiding?
8. What can I learn?
...from this person or situation?
...from this mistake or failure?
...from this success?
9. What action steps make the most sense?
10.What questions should I ask?
11.How can I turn this into a win-win?
12.What's possible?
Some of these questions may seem easy to you. Like what do I want? But not every minute do we really bear that in mind. Often when we are too busy with current works, we're likely to forget what we wanted in the first place. These questions are all good reminders on our path to success.
Just write these questions down! Write on your notebook, if you have one that always in your pocket, or, type them into your cell phone or compture as a wall paper.
Sunday, October 14, 2012
Saturday, October 13, 2012
Listen generously is enough?
I grew up in a culture where humbleness is valued. So one of the important ideas of humbleness is to listen to others carefully and no matter you think the speaker is right or wrong, you should still listen because you can always learn something from anyone. This actually agrees with Benjamin's point in his Project on Moral Perfection. Yet even for me who is from such a culture, I find it hard to follow the principle. Sometimes I can't control myself from judging others before listening to them and thus prejudice pops out of my mind. But even in the cases I follow the principle when it is clear in my mind, I find that listen generously should be treated with care. We listen generously but take the words carefully.
After all, we live in the world full of information, from TV, radio, Internet, newspaper.... We are receiving it in a rate much much higher than the past. First of all, to be honest, the information has several kinds: some is real and authentic, the rest is fake, is fabricated or still needs proving. If we listen generously to all these kinds of information, we will loose ourselves. What is real? We don't know until we take time to judge the information. Secondly, true or false is not enough. We still need to find out what information is useful and relevant to our life or our topic. Some true information that seems to be what we need, is in fact a distraction. Recall how Picasso drew a abstract bull. Are the muscles and furs true? Yes they are. And they make most parts of the bull. But in Picasso's eye, to depict a bull, the skeleton is the core information.
Listen generously is the a good start. To make what we learn from listening truly useful to us, we have one more step: judge the information carefully.
After all, we live in the world full of information, from TV, radio, Internet, newspaper.... We are receiving it in a rate much much higher than the past. First of all, to be honest, the information has several kinds: some is real and authentic, the rest is fake, is fabricated or still needs proving. If we listen generously to all these kinds of information, we will loose ourselves. What is real? We don't know until we take time to judge the information. Secondly, true or false is not enough. We still need to find out what information is useful and relevant to our life or our topic. Some true information that seems to be what we need, is in fact a distraction. Recall how Picasso drew a abstract bull. Are the muscles and furs true? Yes they are. And they make most parts of the bull. But in Picasso's eye, to depict a bull, the skeleton is the core information.
Listen generously is the a good start. To make what we learn from listening truly useful to us, we have one more step: judge the information carefully.
Listen generously is enough?
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Oh NO!
I didn't pass my first Math exam in college. It's HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!
I was confident that I could at least get 80. I got all my homework right before the test. It's not about missing concepts that I've learned. When I check the mistakes, most of them are because of carelessness. It's actually even more frustrated to find the poor grade is the result of carelessness, not that I have missed some concepts or laws.Well, consider it as a wake up college test. This is it.
Saturday, October 6, 2012
Franklin's Humility and Pride(The thirteenth virtue)
Pride, as Benjamin Franklin said in his Project on Moral
Perfection, is one of our toughest natural passions to subdue. He admitted that
he wasn’t successful in acquiring the Reality of this virtue; but merely had a
good deal with regard of the appearance of it. Probably when really
acquires the reality of humility, one would be proud of what he has achieved.
Originally, there were only twelve virtues listed in
Franklin’s project. His proud was still there when making his virtue list as he
didn’t count humility as one of the virtues until his Quaker friend kindly
informed him of the missing point. Yet
his perfection on this virtue turned out to be ‘intimating Jesus and Socrates’.
He forbad himself to the use of words like ‘certainly’, ‘undoubtedly’, etc. Instead,
he uses ‘I conceive’, ‘I apprehend’ or ‘I imagine’ a thing to be so or so. I
think this change of word is just something on the surface. The content
following ‘certainly’ or ‘I conceive’ could be totally the same. The change
just made Franklin sounded humble. But the other change he made as to the
response to something he thought an error, to me, is a useful tool that we can
learn from. Instead of immediately reputing, he began his answer by observing
that in certain cases or circumstances the seemly erroneous opinion would be
right. This is in fact an uncertainty of
what is right and wrong, a reserved way of engaging the conversation. Actually
I have been also using this strategy in the conversation and as a result I’m often
thought as a comfortable friendly guy to talk to. And when I made a mistake, I don’t
have to worry about the embarrassment because I didn’t put my opinion that
strongly as if it were the solid truth. Besides that, I find this technique
helps open your mind. If one does include ‘observing that in certain cases or
circumstances the seemly erroneous opinion would be right’ before judgment, one
can always find a proper case for that opinion and very likely, you probably
won’t think of that if you were put in the case you found.
But Pride is probably coded into our DNA. No matter how one ‘disguise
it, struggle with it, beat it down, stifle it, mortify it’, Pride is still
alive, always there wanting to show itself. That’s why Franklin used an irony at
the ending: ‘Proud of humility’. But is it proper to put an irony here, which
made weak the point he made. The same question can be raised when reading his
irony about ‘the speckled ax’. A man who
wanted his surface of his ax as bright as the edge, yet finally gave up because
of the arduous work needed saying ‘ I think I like a speckled ax best’. I think
the reason for the ironies is that we are all common men. Franklin was an
uncommon common man himself. The moral perfection is a work against bad habits;
struggle to become a better man. It’s especially hard for being a human is
already not an easy thing. With humor, Franklin probably wanted to tell us not
to be too serious about it; we still need to get on with other people. Trying to achieve self-command is also compatible
with self-accepting. After all, this was intended to be read and learned by all
people after Franklin. This made the project of perfection more accessible to
common people. A perfect, flawless character can only be admired. It is just a
distant perfect man. Feeling closer to a common man like themselves, people
will actually be more confident to imitate or learn from him. And that’s the
function of the humor and irony I think in Franklin’ Project for Moral
Perfection.
Friday, October 5, 2012
The Great Failures
But what made those great minds stand up after those obstacles? How did they know that they were heading towards the right direction?
Thursday, October 4, 2012
Failure resume!
XXXX XXXX
EDUCATION
June 2016 Failed to
get into the Mechanical Department in The University of
Illinois at Urbana
Champaign
Lesson learned: I should think closely what I really want to
do instead of changing
my
mind in the middle of the semester
June 2012 Failed to go to the dream high
school
Lesson
learned: I didn’t even apply to the school because I thought I’d never be able
to get in.
But later, I found I had met all the requirements to go to that high school.
I wasn’t able
to evaluate myself properly.
LEADERSHIP AND ACTIVITIES
2011 Failed to organize efficiently the
class chorus
Lesson
learned: I was trying to meet everyone’s demand, hoping that doing so
could
make everyone satisfied. But in fact it is quite impossible to listen to every
single
voice in the group. As an organizer, the basic principle of decision is to
profit the whole group.
June 2011 Failed to be a tutor
Lesson
learned: I was rejected after the first try of being a physics tutor of a
middle school
student. I am good at physics but I failed to consider who I was
tutoring. I explained most of
the concepts in a perspective of a high school student.
I should
adjust my teaching method according to whom I am tutoring.
October 2010 Failed to perform actively in a
textbook drama
Lesson learned: I was pretty confident
I could perform extraordinarily in the
textbook
drama since I knew the textbook well. I skipped most of the rehearsals
which I
thought was simply a waste of time. But no matter how good I am, I can’t
skip
necessary procedures any way.
HOBBIES
August 2012 Lost in the karting racing with
my friends.
Lesson
learned: When I was racing, I always focused on where my opponents
were. I
became rush when I was taken over and felt too good when I was leading.
In
competition, it’s necessary to know where your position is. However, never
lose
your pace regardless falling behind or leading first.
I was thinking what HR would react when they see a resume like this? They will 'LOVE' it!
This I believe
What I find most college students like is to always be together with their friends, or to be social. That way they never feel lonely. And when facing troubles, there are always someone they can turn to for help, which makes them feel safe. I really don't need to list any more about why we want to be social as reasons are obvious. We all know that. But what I belive is solitude. NOT isolation with the society, but for a week or a day, I like to have some hours staying alone.Because in order to be with others, there is always some limitation: you are not totally free.
I don't want to offend my math prof., in fact I love his style of teaching, but I have to say that everytime, I can only understand those concepts or thoeries until I finish reading the textbook myself. There is so limited time in class that I swallow the delicious rather than taste them slowly. I even doubt the necessity of the lecture. What can a student learn when he's just rushing writing new concepts without stopping and taking a look at it? I enjoy reading the textbook by myself. No rush at all. I can have a piece of paper and a pencil. When deliberating over a question in the textbook, I draw or scratch messly on the paper which helps with my thinking. I can spend a whole afternoon like this until I see a concept crystal clear. Trust me, group discussion might give one some clues or ideas, but in the end, to truly reach the point of understanding, he has to sit alone thinking the problem through. After all, what prof. or anyone in the group said is what they understand, not me.
No matter you've noticed it or not, being together with others sacrifices some parts of a person. If he wants to be social, he has to compromise to the popular way of doing things or believes. Vincent van Gogh had a very different perspective of the world. He could give up his uniqueness and join the majority. But it was the uniqueness that led to his greatness. As often sited, 'The truth is in the hands of the few'. Great minds often went through solitude. If they compromise, it is the lost of the world.

Feel no fear of solitude. Embrace it. It's just a necessary part in your life as an individual.
I don't want to offend my math prof., in fact I love his style of teaching, but I have to say that everytime, I can only understand those concepts or thoeries until I finish reading the textbook myself. There is so limited time in class that I swallow the delicious rather than taste them slowly. I even doubt the necessity of the lecture. What can a student learn when he's just rushing writing new concepts without stopping and taking a look at it? I enjoy reading the textbook by myself. No rush at all. I can have a piece of paper and a pencil. When deliberating over a question in the textbook, I draw or scratch messly on the paper which helps with my thinking. I can spend a whole afternoon like this until I see a concept crystal clear. Trust me, group discussion might give one some clues or ideas, but in the end, to truly reach the point of understanding, he has to sit alone thinking the problem through. After all, what prof. or anyone in the group said is what they understand, not me.
No matter you've noticed it or not, being together with others sacrifices some parts of a person. If he wants to be social, he has to compromise to the popular way of doing things or believes. Vincent van Gogh had a very different perspective of the world. He could give up his uniqueness and join the majority. But it was the uniqueness that led to his greatness. As often sited, 'The truth is in the hands of the few'. Great minds often went through solitude. If they compromise, it is the lost of the world.

Feel no fear of solitude. Embrace it. It's just a necessary part in your life as an individual.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)